4.2 Article

Lenalidomide enhances the function of dendritic cells generated from patients with multiple myeloma

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 48-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.11.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health Welfare [HI14C1898]
  2. grant of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST), Republic of Korea [2015R1D1A1A09057809]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1D1A1A09057809] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lenalidomide (LEN) has been used as an immunomodulatory drug with direct and indirect anti-tumor effects. In this study, we evaluated the effect of LEN on the differentiation, maturation, and function of dendritic cells (DCs) in patients with multiple myeloma in vitro. Various doses of LEN were added after the monocytes had differentiated into immature DCs and were activated into mature DCs. LEN (5 mu g/mL) was the optimal concentration to promote differentiation and maturation of DCs. Immature DCs treated with LEN exhibited enhanced endocytic capacity. Mature DCs treated with LEN produced higher levels of interleukin-12p70, possessed stronger allogeneic T-cell stimulation capacity, reduced the number of suppressor cells, and generated antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes more potently compared with control DCs. These results suggest that LEN enhanced the function of DCs generated from patients with multiple myeloma by stimulating the capacity of allogeneic T cells, inhibiting the generation of immunosuppressive cells, inducing naive T cells toward Th1 polarization, and generating potent myeloma-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Copyright (C) 2016 ISEH - International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据