4.0 Article

Daily Mobility Patterns: Reducing or Reproducing Inequalities and Segregation?

期刊

SOCIAL INCLUSION
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 208-221

出版社

COGITATIO PRESS
DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i2.3850

关键词

daily mobility; mobile phone data; residential environment; segregation; Sweden

资金

  1. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [870898]
  2. Ax:son Johnson Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research indicates that daily mobility plays a significant role in residential segregation, with some reduction in segregation during movement, yet most individuals still primarily interact with people and communities in similar segregated environments.
Theory states that residential segregation may have a strong impact on people's life opportunities. It is unclear, however, to what extent the residential environment is a good representation of overall exposure to different people and environments. Daily mobility could reduce the negative effects of segregation if people change environments and/or become more mixed. They could also enhance existing segregation patterns if daily mobility produces more segregated environments. This article uses mobile phone data to track daily mobility patterns with regard to residential segregation. We test the extent to which patterns differ between residents in immigrant-dense areas and those from areas with a greater proportion of natives. Results suggest, in line with previous research, that daily mobility patterns are strongly segregated. Phones originating from more immigrant-dense areas are more likely to (1) remain in the home area and (2) move towards other immigrant-dense areas. Hence, although mobility does mitigate segregation to some extent, most people are mainly exposed to people and neighbourhoods who live in similar segregated environments. These findings are especially interesting given the case study areas: two medium-sized Swedish regions with relatively low levels of segregation and inequality and short journey distances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据