4.6 Article

Highly efficient phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes based on novel bipolar iridium complexes with easily-tuned emission colors by adjusting fluorine substitution on phenylpyridine ligands

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 9, 期 26, 页码 8329-8336

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc01498f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773078, 21935005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new designed and synthesized iridium complexes show good thermal stability and photoluminescence quantum yields, with easily tunable emission colors and excellent bipolar charge transporting ability. The doped OLEDs exhibit high peak external quantum efficiency within a wide concentration range and maintain high efficiency at practical luminance levels.
Two new phenylpyridine derivative-based heteroleptic iridium complexes, (Fppy)(2)Ir(dipg) (Fppdg) and (CF(3)ppy)(2)Ir(dipg) (tFmppdg) with emission peaks of 545 nm and 581 nm, respectively, were designed and synthesized by incorporation of a dipg group (N,N '-diisopro-guanidinate) as the ancillary ligand. Their photophysical, thermal, electrochemical and electroluminescence properties were investigated. The results indicate that the emitting color of phosphorescent complexes can be tuned easily by adjusting their F/CF3-substituted cyclometalated ligands. Simultaneously, Fppdg and tFmppdg show good thermal stabilities, short lifetimes of the triplet state and high photoluminescence quantum yields. More importantly, their almost complete spatial separation of HOMO and LUMO distributions endows both phosphors with an amazing bipolar charge transporting ability, and thus the corresponding doped OLEDs possess desirable concentration-independent and negligible efficiency roll-off features: at a rather wide concentration range of 8-25% doped in the CBP host, both phosphors realize a very high peak external quantum efficiency (EQE) level of >20%, and maintain values of >18% at a practical luminance of 1000 cd m(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据