4.2 Article

Examining Variations in Action Plan Quality Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care

期刊

出版社

AMER BOARD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200285

关键词

Chronic Disease; Disease Management; Health Literacy; Health Surveys; Patient Participation; Patient Centered Care; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures; Primary Health Care; Self-Management; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

资金

  1. NIH [DK108039]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the overall quality of action plans for T2DM patients was moderate-high. Higher health literacy and absence of social risks were associated with higher action plan quality, while patient demographics and mental health measures were unrelated to quality. Quality of action plans was positively correlated with patient confidence in the plan.
Introduction: Collaborative goal setting and action-planning are key elements of self-management support for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), however little is known regarding action plan quality or correlation of quality in primary T2DM care. Methods: T2DM patients from 12 primary care sites participated in either: Connection to Health (CTH; 6 practices), consisting of a health survey followed by collaborative action planning, or Enhanced Engagement CTH (EE-CTH; 6 practices), including additional training in relationship building promoting patient engagement. Action plan quality was rated using an adapted version of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D) (dual coding of 20%, inter-rater reliability [IRR] >80%). Associations with patient characteristics were examined using generalized linear mixed models adjusting for clustering by clinic and intervention arm. Results: With a mean score 6 standard deviation (SD) of 14.62 +/- 6 3.87 on a 0 to 20 scale (n = 725), overall action plan quality was moderate-high. Higher health literacy (beta = 1.184, 95% CI, 0.326-2.041; P = .007), and having no social risks (beta = 0.416; 95% CI, 0.062-0.770; P = .021) were associated with higher action plan quality, whereas sex, age, language, education level, depression, stress, and health distress were unrelated to quality (P value not significant). Higher quality was associated with greater patient confidence in the plan (beta = 0.050; 95% CI, 0.016-0.084, P = .004). Conclusions: Although there was a considerable difference in action plan quality ratings, ratings did not systematically differ based on most patient demographic or mental health measures. Results suggest that action planning should be tailored to health literacy and social risks. Further research should examine associations between quality and longer-term clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据