3.8 Article

Developing a checklist for reporting research using simulated patient methodology(CRISP): a consensus study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 218-227

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riaa002

关键词

simulated patient Delphi panel; reporting checklist; health services

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized Delphi method to create a reporting checklist for simulated patient methodology by gathering input from 29 authors. Consensus was reached on 29 out of 54 items in round 2 and 45 out of 63 items in round 3, resulting in a final checklist of 28 items. This checklist aims to improve transparency and consistency in health service research studies using simulated patients, in addition to existing guidelines like CONSORT or STROBE.
Objectives Simulated patients are increasingly used to measure outcomes in health services but reporting is suboptimal.This study aims to create a checklist for the reporting of simulated patient (SP) methodology. Methods This was a Delphi study.The authors of health service research studies using SP methodology were invited to participate. Round 1 questionnaire assessed the applicability of the TIDieR (Template for Intervention Description and Replication) reporting checklist for SP methodology and asked for rewording of/additional items. Responses were thematically analysed to generate Round 2 items in which participants rated each item for importance (seven-point Likert scale) and median, mode and IQR were calculated. In Round 3, participants were invited to rescore their Round 2 responses. Consensus was defined as an IQR <= 1 (Extremely important) and median <= 2 (Very important). All consensus items were considered for inclusion in the checklist. Similarly, worded items were rationalised and items not specific to SP methodology or other existing checklists were excluded. Key findings Twenty-nine authors participated in Round 1 and a further seven for Rounds 2 and 3. Twenty-six responses were analysed for Round 1, 30 for Round 2 and 28 for Round 3. There was consensus on 29 of 54 items in Round 2 and 45 of 63 items in Round 3. The final checklist comprised 28 items. Conclusions A new reporting checklist to guide the reporting of studies, using simulated patients, complementary to CONSORT or STROBE, has been developed and will now be tested for usability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据