4.7 Article

A Modified Huber Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Algorithm for Hyperspectral Unmixing

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3081984

关键词

Hyperspectral imaging; Convergence; Robustness; Matrix decomposition; Sparse matrices; Optimization; Analytical models; Modified Huber (mHuber); nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF); projected conjugated gradient; tuning parameter

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61877021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a modified Huber NMF model to achieve robustness to outliers and different kinds of noise in hyperspectral unmixing, with an accelerated convergence rate through replacing updating rules and utilizing a new tuning parameter. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method compared to state-of-the-art NMF methods in HU.
Hypersepctral unmixing (HU) has been one of the most challenging tasks in hyperspectral image research. Recently, nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has shown its superiority in hyperspectral unmixing due to its flexible modeling and little prior requirement. But most NMF algorithms tend to use least square function as the objective, which is sensitive to outliers and different kinds of noise. In this article, we propose a modified Huber (mHuber) NMF model to achieve robustness to outliers and different kinds of noise. Under this robust model, we accelerate the half-quadratic optimization algorithm by replacing multiplicative updating rule with a projected nonlinear conjugated gradient rule, which achieves much faster convergence rate. Moreover, a new tuning parameter, rather than a fixed one, is given to adapt to mHuber loss function. Finally, we perform algorithm analysis and experiments in the synthetic and real-world datasets, which confirms the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method when compared with several state-of-the-art NMF methods in HU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据