4.7 Article

Dual-specificity Phosphatase 9 protects against Cardiac Hypertrophy by targeting ASK1

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 2193-2204

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.57130

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that DUSP9 plays a crucial role in cardiac hypertrophy, alleviating it by repressing ASK1, making it a promising prospective target for treating cardiac hypertrophy.
The functions of dual-specificity phosphatase 9 (DUSP9) in hepatic steatosis and metabolic disturbance during nonalcoholic fatty liver disease were discussed in our prior study. However, its roles in the pathophysiology of pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy remain to be illustrated. This study attempted to uncover the potential contributions and underpinning mechanisms of DUSP9 in cardiac hypertrophy. Utilizing the gain-and-loss-of-functional approaches of DUSP9 the cardiac phenotypes arising from the pathological, echocardiographic, and molecular analysis were quantified. The results showed increased levels of DUSP9 in hypertrophic mice heart and angiotensin II treated cardiomyocytes. In accordance with the results of cellular hypertrophy in response to angiotensin II, cardiac hypertrophy exaggeration, fibrosis, and malfunction triggered by pressure overload was evident in the case of cardiac-specific conditional knockout of DUSP9. In contrast, transgenic mice hearts with DUSP9 overexpression portrayed restoration of the hypertrophic phenotypes. Further explorations of molecular mechanisms indicated the direct interaction of DUSP9 with ASK1, which further repressed p38 and JNK signaling pathways. Moreover, blocking ASK1 with ASK1-specific inhibitor compensated the pro-hypertrophic effects induced by DUSP9 deficiency in cardiomyocytes. The main findings of this study suggest the potential of DUSP9 in alleviating cardiac hypertrophy at least partially by repressing ASK1, thereby looks promising as a prospective target against cardiac hypertrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据