4.6 Article

Hard x-ray photoemission spectroscopy of LaVO3/SrTiO3: Band alignment and electronic reconstruction

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.235128

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [SI 851/2-1, 431448015]
  2. Wurzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter ct.qmat [EXC 2147, 390858490]
  3. Collaborative Research Center ToCoTronics [SFB 1170, 258499086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heterostructure of LaVO3 and SrTiO3 shows promise for future photovoltaic applications due to their matching excitation gap and correlated nature at the interface. However, there is still a lack of experimental data and profound understanding of the electronic properties of the heterostructure.
A heterostructure consisting of the Mott insulator LaVO3 and the band insulator SrTiO3 is considered a promising candidate for future photovoltaic applications. Not only does the (direct) excitation gap of LaVO3 match well the solar spectrum, but its correlated nature and predicted built-in potential, owing to the nonpolar/polar interface when integrated with SrTiO3, also offer remarkable advantages over conventional solar cells. However, experimental data beyond the observation of a thickness-dependent metal-insulator transition are scarce and a profound, microscopic understanding of the electronic properties is still lacking. By means of soft and hard x-ray photoemission spectroscopy as well as resistivity and Hall effect measurements we study the electrical properties, band bending, and band alignment of LaVO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. We find a critical LaVO3 thickness of five unit cells, confinement of the conducting electrons to exclusively Ti 3d states at the interface, and a potential gradient in the film. From these findings we conclude on electronic reconstruction as the driving mechanism for the formation of the metallic interface in LaVO3/SrTiO3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据