4.6 Article

Tunneling-related electron spin relaxation in self-assembled quantum-dot molecules

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245422

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [2014/14/M/ST3/00821, 2014/13/B/ST3/04603]
  2. Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing [203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The theoretical study reveals that the spin-flip tunneling rate can be as high as 1% of the spin-conserving one, and the main contribution comes from the Dresselhaus spin-orbit interaction. Despite the absence of a magnetic field, the spin relaxation process remains active at a considerable rate.
We study theoretically spin relaxation during phonon-assisted tunneling of a single electron in self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum-dot molecules formed by vertically stacked dots. We find that the spin-flip tunneling rate may be as high as 1% of the spin-conserving one. By studying the dependence of spin-relaxation rate on external fields, we show that the process is active at a considerable rate even without the magnetic field, and scales with the latter differently than the relaxation in a Zeeman doublet Utilizing a multiband k.p theory, we selectively investigate the impact of various spin-mixing terms in the electron energy and carrier-phonon interaction Hamiltonians. As a result, we identify the main contribution to come from the Dresselhaus spin-orbit interaction, which is responsible for the zero-field effect. At magnetic fields above similar to 15 T, this is surpassed by other contributions due to the structural shear strain. We also study the impact of the sample morphology and determine that the misalignment of the dots may enhance relaxation rate by over an order of magnitude. Finally, via virtual tunneling at nonzero temperature, the process in question also affects stationary electrons in tunnel-coupled structures and provides a Zeeman-doublet spin-relaxation channel even without the magnetic field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据