4.7 Article

On the metal-ligand bonding in dinuclear complexes with redox-active guanidine ligands

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 50, 期 27, 页码 9467-9482

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt01354h

关键词

-

资金

  1. German research foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the analysis of metal-guanidine bonding in dinuclear transition metal complexes with redox-active tetrakisguanidine ligands. Results showed the peculiarity of copper-guanidine bonding with a high pi-bond contribution to the metal-guanidine bonding.
Coordination compounds with redox-active ligands are currently intensively studied. Within this research theme, redox-active guanidines have been established as a new, eminent class of redox-active ligands. In this work the variation of metal-guanidine bonding in dinuclear transition metal complexes with bridging redox-active tetrakisguanidine ligands is analysed. A series of dinuclear complexes with different metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn) is synthesized, using either newly prepared redox-active tetrakisguanidino-dioxine or previously reported tetrakisguanidino-benzene ligands. The discussion of the bond properties in this work is predominantly based on the trends of structural parameters, derived from determination of single-crystal structures by X-ray diffraction and quantum chemical calculations. In addition, the trends in the redox potentials and magnetometric (SQUID) measurements on some of the complexes are included. Due to their combined sigma- and pi-electron donor capability, redox-active guanidine ligands are weak-field ligands; the sigma- and pi-bonding contributions vary with the metal. The results highlight the peculiarity of copper-guanidine bonding with a high pi-bond contribution to metal-guanidine bonding, enabled by structural distortion of the coordination mode from tetrahedral in the direction of square-planar, short copper-guanidine bonds and minor displacement of the copper atoms from the ligand aromatic plane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据