4.6 Article

Autoantigens ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are significantly upregulated in active Psoriasis and localized with keratinocytes, dendritic cells and other leukocytes

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 1075-1082

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.13378

关键词

ADAMTSL5; dendritic cells; LL37/Cathelicidin; macrophages; psoriasis

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [UL1 RR024143]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1TR001866]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated disease that affects 2%-4% of individuals in North America and Europe. In the past decade, advances in research have led to an improved understanding of immune pathways involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and has spurred the development of targeted therapeutics. Recently, three psoriasis autoantigens have been described: cathelicidin (LL37), a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain containing thrombospondin type 1 motif-like 5 (ADAMTSL5), and lipid antigens generated by phospholipase A2 (PLA2) group IVD (PLA2G4D). It is important to establish the expression, regulation and therapeutic modulation of these psoriasis autoantigens. In this study, we performed immunohistochemistry and two-colour immunofluorescence on non-lesional and lesional psoriasis skin to characterize ADAMTSL5 and LL37, and their co-expression with T cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils and macrophages, which are the main immune cells that drive this disease. Our results showed that ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are significantly (P<.05) increased in lesional skin and are co-expressed by many dendritic cells, macrophages and some T cells in the dermis. Gene expression analysis showed significant (P<.05) upregulation of LL37 in lesional skin and significant downregulation following treatment with etanercept. ADAMTSL5 and LL37 are also significantly decreased by IL-17 or TNF- blockade, suggesting feed-forward induction of psoriasis autoantigens by disease-related cytokines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据