3.8 Article

Bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states from Kahler structures

期刊

SCIPOST PHYSICS CORE
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SCIPOST FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.4.3.025

关键词

-

资金

  1. VILLUM FONDEN via the QMATH center of excellence [10059]
  2. NSF [PHY-1806428]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states can be uniquely characterized by a linear complex structure J, providing a unified framework to treat both types of particles simultaneously. Pure and mixed Gaussian states can be identified with compatible Kahler structures, with J(2) being a key parameter. By applying these methods, computations involving Gaussian states can be simplified to algebraic operations, leading to the discovery of new identities and facilitating the study of entanglement, system dynamics, and driven systems.
We show that bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states (also known as squeezed coherent states) can be uniquely characterized by their linear complex structure J which is a linear map on the classical phase space. This extends conventional Gaussian methods based on covariance matrices and provides a unified framework to treat bosons and fermions simultaneously. Pure Gaussian states can be identified with the triple (G, Omega, J) of compatible Kahler structures, consisting of a positive definite metric G, a symplectic form Omega and a linear complex structure J with J(2) = -1. Mixed Gaussian states can also be identified with such a triple, but with J(2) not equal -1. We apply these methods to show how computations involving Gaussian states can be reduced to algebraic operations of these objects, leading to many known and some unknown identities. We apply these methods to the study of (A) entanglement and complexity, (B) dynamics of stable systems, (C) dynamics of driven systems. From this, we compile a comprehensive list of mathematical structures and formulas to compare bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states side-by-side. Copyright L. Hackl and E. Bianchi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据