4.6 Article

Puerarin inhibits amyloid β-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in retinal pigment epithelial cells via suppressing ROS-dependent oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stresses

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 357, 期 2, 页码 335-340

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.05.030

关键词

Puerarin; Amyloid beta(1-40); NLRP3 inflammasome; Retinal pigment epithelial; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81300787]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141103]
  3. Major Project of Wuxi Municipal Health Bureau [ZS201401, Z201508]
  4. Project of Wuxi Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [CSE31N1520, CSE31N1621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid beta (A beta) is a critical stimulator that promotes the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by A beta is estimated to be responsible for retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) dysfunction in such disease. Puerarin, one of the major active constituents of Kudzu root, has been widely used in the clinical treatment of AMD in China for decades; however, the detailed molecular mechanism remains far from clear. In this study, we investigated the protective effect and underlying mechanism of puerarin against AN to-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS-primed ARPE-19 cells. The results showed that A beta(1-40) induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation mainly via triggering ROS-dependent oxidative stress, particularly lipid peroxidation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress in LPS-primed ARPE-19 cells; however, such effect could be significantly reversed by puerarin in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the effect of puerarin was potentially mediated through activating Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant signaling pathway and inhibiting A beta(1-40)-induced phosphorylation of IRE1 and PERK as well as nuclear expression of ATF6 alpha. Therefore, the significance of the current study is to reveal the novel mechanism of puerarin in the prevention of AMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据