4.1 Article

Experimental study of adhesively bonded natural fibre composite - steel hybrid laminates

期刊

COMPOSITES PART C: OPEN ACCESS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100157

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multi-material design approach was proposed in this study for developing a novel hybrid structure by adhesively bonding a thin metal layer to NFC using commercial epoxy adhesive and natural rubber. The research showed that the joint bonded with epoxy adhesive was stronger than the one bonded with natural rubber, supported by the observation of adherend failure in the former and adhesive failure in the latter. The research highlights the feasibility of adhesively bonded NFC - metal hybrid structures.
Natural fibre composites (NFC), such as flax fibre reinforced plastics are green material with good specific properties. Significant research is currently in progress to improve the mechanical properties and durability of these composites and to make them competitive to traditional synthetic composites. A multi-material design approach is proposed in this study to develop a novel hybrid structure with a thin metal layer adhesively bonded to NFC. Two adhesives; a commercial epoxy adhesive and natural rubber were used for the adhesion between a stainless steel layer and flax composite with thermoset and thermoplastic matrix. The performance of the hybrid joint was investigated using a single lap joint (SLJ) test supported by full-field displacement measurement methods. The manufacturing of the composite specimen and the bonding of the NFC - metal joint with rubber adhesive was demonstrated. The force displacement curves from the SLJ test showed that the bonded joint with epoxy adhesive was stronger in comparison to the bonding with natural rubber. It is supported by the adherend failure observed in the joint with epoxy adhesive, while the rubber joint showed adhesive failure. The key outcome of the research is that the viability of adhesively bonded NFC - metal hybrid is established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据