4.2 Article

Collisions of ultracold molecules in bright and dark optical dipole traps

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. European Union [817482]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EXC-2111-390814868, FOR 2247]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE30-0015]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE30-0015] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding collisions between ultracold molecules is crucial for stable molecular quantum gases and quantum engineering. Testing the hypothesis of light-induced collisional loss using low light intensities revealed discrepancies with theoretical predictions, highlighting the need for further research in this area.
Understanding collisions between ultracold molecules is crucial for making stable molecular quantum gases and harnessing their rich internal degrees of freedom for quantum engineering. Transient complexes can strongly influence collisional physics, but in the ultracold regime, key aspects of their behavior have remained unknown. To explain experimentally observed loss of ground-state molecules from optical dipole traps, it was recently proposed that molecular complexes can be lost due to photoexcitation. By trapping molecules in a repulsive box potential using laser light near a narrow molecular transition, we are able to test this hypothesis with light intensities three orders of magnitude lower than what is typical in red-detuned dipole traps. This allows us to investigate light-induced collisional loss in a gas of nonreactive fermionic Na-23 K-40 molecules. Even for the lowest intensities available in our experiment, our results are consistent with universal loss, meaning unit loss probability inside the short-range interaction potential. Our findings disagree by at least two orders of magnitude with latest theoretical predictions, showing that crucial aspects of molecular collisions are not yet understood and provide a benchmark for the development of new theories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据