4.2 Article

Harmonic distortion characterization in groups of distribution networks applying the IEEE Standard 519-2014

期刊

IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 526-533

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2021.9448534

关键词

Distribution networks; Rough sets; Instruments; Mathematical model; Computational modeling; Total harmonic distortion; Silicon compounds; Clustering methods; Data Clustering; Distribution Networks; harmonic distortion; IEEE 519-2014; rough sets theory

资金

  1. project An ICT platform for sustainable energy ecosystem in smart cities [ELAC2015/T10-0643]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the similarities in harmonic distortion behavior in distribution networks using k-means clustering and rough sets theory. The empirical analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of this method in characterizing and validating the behavior of distribution networks.
Recently, it has been produced an accelerated presence of non-linear elements in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors, which has affected the voltage waveform, altering its amplitude and frequency. These sectors obtain the electric energy from distribution networks, so it is essential to check them systematically in order to ensure the power quality according to operational guidelines and national standards. Power quality involves a wide variety of electromagnetic phenomena on the power system, highlighting the harmonics. This paper presents an application based on the k-means clustering to identify similarities in the behavior of the harmonic distortion of voltage and current in distribution networks and its validation and refinement using the rough sets theory. The main result lies in the characterization of those groups of distribution networks by means of their centroids and according to the IEEE Standard 519-2014. To verify the methodology, field measurements of a group of distribution networks in Cuba are analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据