3.8 Article

Transparent polymer nanocomposite with three-dimensional ZnO thin-shell with high UV-shielding performance

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2631-6331/ac069c

关键词

nanocomposite; UV-shielding film; 3D nanostructure; proximity-field nanopatterning (PnP)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2020M3D1A1110522]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020M3D1A1110522] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel concept of transparent nanocomposite with a three-dimensional ZnO thin-shell, providing efficient UV-shielding performance and the potential for large-scale production using proximity-field nanoPatterning and atomic layer deposition techniques.
This paper introduces a nontrivial concept of a transparent nanocomposite with a three-dimensional (3D) ZnO thin-shell, as an ultraviolet (UV)-shielding reinforcement which absorbs all ranges of UV light, including UV-A (320 nm-400 nm). The continuous and ordered geometry of the 3D ZnO thin-shell, uniformly distributed in an epoxy matrix, efficiently captures incident UV light by repeatedly scattering and absorbing UV light at the epoxy-ZnO interfaces. Proximity-field nanoPatterning and atomic layer deposition can be employed to produce a 3D ZnO thin-shell array on a large scale (>1 inch(2)). The fabricated 3D ZnO/epoxy nanocomposite film exhibits excellent UV-shielding performance, blocking 95.20% of UV-A light. Transmittance at the edge of the UV-A range (400 nm) is suppressed by 64% (from 86% to 31%), while transmittance in the visible range (550 nm) is retained (from 90% to 75%). Moreover, the UV-shielding capability of the 3D nanocomposite film can be tailored by controlling the ZnO shell thickness from 0 nm to 45 nm. The 3D ZnO/epoxy nanocomposite provides a good option for next-generation transparent UV-shielding films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据