4.7 Article

Comparison of architecture and adaptive energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric logistics vehicle

期刊

ENERGY
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120858

关键词

Energy management strategy; Plug-in hybrid electric logistics vehicle; Fuel economy; Driving pattern recognition

资金

  1. Ningbo Science and technology project of China [2019B10111]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0106403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper compares the architecture and adaptive energy management strategy (EMS) for plug-in hybrid electric logistics vehicles (PHELV) with different hybrid powertrain systems using dynamic programming (DP) algorithm. An approach of adaptive EMS based on driving pattern recognition (DPR) is proposed, optimizing parameters for fuel consumption cost, fuzzy logic controller (FLC), and equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS). Comparative results show improvements in fuel economy for series PHELV compared to parallel and series-parallel PHELV, with differences between optimal energy management strategies and global optimization.
This paper deals with the comparison of architecture and adaptive energy management strategy (EMS) for hybrid powertrain system (HPS), including one or two electric motor, an engine and a battery, for a plug-in hybrid electric logistics vehicle (PHELV). The most attractive advantage deriving from HPSs is the possibility of reducing emission and improving fuel economic. For comparison purposes, the series, parallel, and series-parallel hybrid powertrain system are examined by dynamic programming (DP) al-gorithm using the same vehicular parameters. The approach of adaptive EMS is driving pattern recog-nition (DPR) to obtain optimum estimation of EMS parameters under different driving cycle. A back propagation (BP) neural network DPR optimized model by an improved genetic algorithm (IGA) has been proposed. Taking the costs of fuel consumption, the parameters of the fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) are optimized. The comparative results show that the series PHELV fuel economy improvements are 7.60% and 6.53%, compared with parallel and series-parallel PHELV. The difference between the optimal fuzzy energy management strategy and the global optimization is 4.74%, and the ECMS is 4.66%. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据