4.8 Article

Evidence for large microbial-mediated losses of soil carbon under anthropogenic warming

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 507-517

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-021-00178-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ramon y Cajal grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RYC2018-024766-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthropogenic warming is expected to accelerate global soil organic carbon losses, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions and the need for more aggressive emission reduction measures to curb climate change. Studying the interactions between soil microbial communities and temperature, as well as how substrate availability affects SOC loss estimates, is crucial for improving the accuracy and precision of projected losses.
Anthropogenic warming is expected to accelerate global soil organic carbon (SOC) losses via microbial decomposition, yet, there is still no consensus on the loss magnitude. In this Perspective, we argue that, despite the mechanistic uncertainty underlying these losses, there is confidence that a strong, positive land carbon-climate feedback can be expected. Two major lines of evidence support net global SOC losses with warming via increases in soil microbial metabolic activity: the increase in soil respiration with temperature and the accumulation of SOC in low mean annual temperature regions. Warming-induced SOC losses are likely to be of a magnitude relevant for emission negotiations and necessitate more aggressive emission reduction targets to limit climate change to 1.5 degrees C by 2100. We suggest that microbial community-temperature interactions, and how they are influenced by substrate availability, are promising research areas to improve the accuracy and precision of the magnitude estimates of projected SOC losses. Degradation of soil organic carbon is expected to accelerate with increasing global temperatures, but the magnitude of change is controversial. This Perspective discusses evidence supporting a large loss of soil organic carbon and its broader significance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据