3.9 Article

Montivipera bornmuelleri venom selectively exhibits high cytotoxic effects on keratinocytes cancer cell lines

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 173-178

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2017.01.001

关键词

Cytotoxicity; HaCaT cells; A5 cells; 114 cells

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS-Lebanon)
  2. Francophone University Agency (AUF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The Viperidae family venom is a rich source of bioactive compounds such as many proteases, which cause tissue necrosis and affect mostly the vascular system. However, the venom exhibits therapeutic potentials and has contributed to the development of some medical drugs. Specifically, the Montivipera bornmuelleri venom has shown to exhibit antibacterial, pro-inflammatory and antifungal activities. Objective: This work evaluates the cytotoxic effect of the M. bornmuelleri venom on human-derived keratinocytes including the non-tumorigenic HaCaT, the benign A5 and the low-grade malignant 114 cells. Materials and methods: The toxicity of different venom concentrations (0.9, 1.87, 3.75, 7.5, 15, 30 and 60 mu g/mL) and their effect on the viability of the cells lines were assessed using the Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and the Trypan blue tests after 24 h of incubation. Results: The venom was able to reduce the viability of all cell lines in a dose dependent manner with the HaCat cells being the least affected. For example, the 60 mu g/mL dose induced a more significant decrease the viability of A5 (44%) and 114 (21.33%) keratinocytes as compared to HaCaT cells (70.63%). Also, this venom showed a higher cytotoxic activity on the A5 (52.45%) and 114 (98.67%) cells as compared to HaCaT cells (30.14%) with an IC50 estimated at 10 mu g/mL on 114 and at 60 mu g/mL on benign A5. Discussion and conclusion: Those differential cytotoxic effects of the M. bornmuelleri venom pave the road for more advanced studies which might unravel the potential anticancer effects of this venom. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据