4.7 Article

Linear Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Dual Cross-Link Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel with Determined Borate Ion Concentration

期刊

GELS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels7020071

关键词

polymer hydrogel; temporary network; transient network; viscoelasticity; rheology

资金

  1. MEXT Project [JPMXS0421800220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The linear dynamic viscoelasticity of DC-PVA hydrogels with permanent and transient cross-links was investigated. Permanent cross-linking increased relaxation strength while the relaxation frequency was slightly lower and influenced by the lifetime of transient cross-links.
We investigated the linear dynamic viscoelasticity of dual cross-link (DC) poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (DC-PVA) hydrogels with permanent and transient cross-links. The concentrations of incorporated borate ions to form transient cross-links in the DC-PVA hydrogels (C-B(IN)) were determined by the azomethine-H method. The dynamic viscoelasticity of the DC-PVA hydrogel cannot be described by a simple sum of the dynamic viscoelasticity of the PVA gel with the same permanent cross-link concentration and the PVA aqueous solution with the same borate ion concentration (C-B = C-B(IN)) as in the DC-PVA gel. The DC-PVA hydrogel exhibited a considerably higher relaxation strength, indicating that the introduction of permanent cross-links into temporary networks increases the number of viscoelastic chains with finite relaxation times. In contrast, the relaxation frequency (omega(c)) (given by the frequency at the maximum of loss modulus) for the DC-PVA hydrogel was slightly lower but comparable to that for a dilute PVA solution with the same C-B. This signifies that the relaxation dynamics of the DC-PVA hydrogels is essentially governed by the lifetime of an interchain transient cross-link (di-diol complex of boron). The effect of permanent cross-linking on the relaxation dynamics was observed in the finite broadening of the relaxation-time distribution in the long time region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据