4.7 Article

A mobility compensation method for drones in SG-eIoT

期刊

DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 196-200

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2020.07.011

关键词

SG-eIoT; Drones; Mobility; Frequency offset compensation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of electricity Internet of Things (eIoT) has been proposed to assist the monitoring and inspection of power transmission line state and optimize asset utilization. Drones are introduced into the eIoT for fast inspection and data collection, acting as central communication control points to serve data exchange. A mobility compensation method is proposed to address the impact of drone mobility on signal transmission and position estimation, showing favorable gains in Monte Carlo simulations.
In order to achieve the specific goal of a smart grid, the concept of electricity Internet of Things (eIoT) has been proposed to assist the monitoring and inspection of power transmission line state and optimize the asset utilization. The long power transmission line and the complex field operation environment urge the introduction of drones into the eIoT for fast power transmission line inspection, data collection from sensors for further big data analysis, adaptive control of power line voltage, etc. Additionally, drones can also act as a central communication control or relay point to serve the data exchange among sensors, drones and power transmission line maintenance personnel in the scenario where the conventional mobile communication service is not available. However, the fast mobility of drones may affect the signal transmission and position estimation performance, which may further deteriorate the networking performance. In order to solve this problem, a mobility compensation method is proposed, which includes the steps of frequency offset estimation and relative velocity calculation. Through the Monte Carlo simulations, the proposed algorithm shows favorable gains compared with the conventional ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据