4.1 Article

Relaxin Inhibits Cardiac Fibrosis in Diabetic Rats: Roles of Protein Kinase Cδ

期刊

出版社

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116946

关键词

relaxin; diabetes; cardiac fibrosis; protein kinase C delta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relaxin (Rlx) is known to antagonize diabetic cardiac fibrosis. However, its mechanism is poorly understood. Protein kinase C delta (PKC delta) plays a crucial role in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). This study explored the involvement of PKC delta in Rlx's capacity of suppressing cardiac fibrosis in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Type 2 DM of 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats was induced by a high-fat diet and the injection of streptozocin (STZ, 40 mg/kg). Fourteen-week-old rats with DM and rats in control group which were pretreated for 1 week with human recombinant relaxin (rhRlx, 30 mu g/kg.d), were assessed to detect cardiacfibrosis and PKC delta expression with Western blot. Cardiac fibroblasts of neonatal rats were treated for 72 h with rhRlx (100 ng/ml) under high glucose (HG). Western blot was utilized for detecting the membranous and cytoplasmic protein expressions of PKC delta. The effects of rhRlx and PKC delta inhibitor (rottlerin) were assessed either alone or in combination on the HG-induced proliferation and differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts and the release of collagen I. Rlx treatment inhibited the differentiation of cardiacfibroblasts and the expression of collagen I. The expression of PKC delta was regulated by Rlx in diabetic rats and cardiac fibroblasts under HG condition. The effects of Rlx upon the proliferation and differentiation of cardiacfibroblasts and the excretion of collagen I under HG were blunted by rottlerin. Rlx suppressed cardiac fibrosis in type 2 diabetic rats. This beneficial effect was associated with its ability of modulating the expression of PKC delta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据