4.1 Article

Long-term Consequences of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to Classic 21-hydroxylase Deficiency in Adolescents and Adults

期刊

出版社

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123037

关键词

adrenal gland neoplasm; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; testicular adrenal rest tumor; 21-hydroxlyase deficiency

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2016M3A9B4915706]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M3A9B4915706] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) from pediatric to adulthood is challenging to achieve optimal growth and puberty. This study characterizes the clinical outcomes of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Methods 53 CAH patients were included (33 females, 15 and 18 patients with the salt-wasting [SW] and simple-virilizing [SV] forms; and 20 males, 16 and 4 patients with the SW and SV forms). We reviewed growth parameters, pubertal status, and long-term morbidities. Results In females, the age at pubertal onset and pubarche was 9.6 +/- 0.9 and 10.5 +/- 1.9 years, respectively, which was significantly earlier in the SV form (p = 0.005). In males, the ages at pubertal onset and pubarche were 10.1 +/- 2.0 and 10.7 +/- 2.5 years, respectively, which were not significantly different between the groups. Forty patients reached adult height: -2.1 +/- 1.6 SDS in males and -1.5 +/- 1.1 SDS in females. Obesity and overweight was significantly common in adult patients. Testicular adrenal rest tumors were found in 4 SW males. 5 patients had adrenal tumor including adenoma, adenocarcinoma, or myelolipoma. Conclusions Reduced adult height and obesity/overweight are prevalent in adulthood. Adolescents and adults with 21-hydroxylase deficiency should be monitored for long-term consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据