期刊
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -出版社
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bs11060085
关键词
accuracy; bias; body postures; deception detection; embodiment; empathy; experimental design; eye tracking; facial expressions; veracity judgment
The study found that judges adopting an open posture were more accurate in detecting deception, and trait empathy had an additive effect on posture. Posture affects judges' attention to visual information and veracity judgments when determining deceptive statements.
Body postures can affect how we process and attend to information. Here, a novel effect of adopting an open or closed posture on the ability to detect deception was investigated. It was hypothesized that the posture adopted by judges would affect their social acuity, resulting in differences in the detection of nonverbal behavior (i.e., microexpression recognition) and the discrimination of deceptive and truthful statements. In Study 1, adopting an open posture produced higher accuracy for detecting naturalistic lies, but no difference was observed in the recognition of brief facial expressions as compared to adopting a closed posture; trait empathy was found to have an additive effect on posture, with more empathic judges having higher deception detection scores. In Study 2, with the use of an eye-tracker, posture effects on gazing behavior when judging both low-stakes and high-stakes lies were measured. Sitting in an open posture reduced judges' average dwell times looking at senders, and in particular, the amount and length of time they focused on their hands. The findings suggest that simply shifting posture can impact judges' attention to visual information and veracity judgments (M-g = 0.40, 95% CI (0.03, 0.78)).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据