4.4 Article

Establishment and validation of prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer-specific survival for patients with osteosarcoma

期刊

NEOPLASMA
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 434-446

出版社

AEPRESS SRO
DOI: 10.4149/neo_2020_200617N639

关键词

nomogram; osteosarcoma; overall survival; cancer-specific survival

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed and validated nomograms predicting survival of osteosarcoma patients, demonstrating their high accuracy in predicting 3- and 5-year survival rates. The results indicate that nomograms based on the SEER database are reliable tools for survival prediction in osteosarcoma patients.
This study aimed to develop and validate nomograms predicting the survival of osteosarcoma patients from the SEER database and our hospital. Data of 1,066 osteosarcoma patients from the SEER database were randomly divided into a development cohort (n=800) and validation cohort one (n=266). Another cohort of 126 patients from our hospital was utilized as validation cohort two. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Nomograms predicting the 3- and 5-year OS and CSS probability were constructed and validated. The predictive performances of the established nomograms were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and the calibration plot. Variables of age, surgical stage, surgery, grade, tumor site, and tumor size were identified as independent prognosticators for OS and CSS in Cox analyses. The C-indexes for OS and CSS in the development cohort were 0.818 and 0.829. Comparatively, the C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.843 and 0.834, 0.736 and 0.782 for validation cohort one and two, respectively. Calibration plots showed excellent consistency between nomogram prediction and actual survival. Nomograms based on the SEER database are of high accuracy and can serve as a reliable tool for individualized consultation and survival prediction in osteosarcoma patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据