3.8 Article

Sensory characterization of vegetarian pizza by using quantitative descriptive analysis

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 101-109

出版社

INDIAN DAIRY ASSOC
DOI: 10.33785/IJDS.2021.v74i02.001

关键词

Pizza; Principal Component Analysis (PCA); Sensory Evaluation; Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of vegetarian pizza is on the rise worldwide due to the increasing popularity of vegetarian diets, yet a proper description of its sensory attributes is lacking in the existing scientific literature. This study objectively characterized the sensory attributes of vegetarian pizza using statistical tools, identifying five principal components that explained 93% of the variation in sensory data. These findings provide valuable information for product evaluation and process improvement.
Consumption of vegetarian pizza is increasing worldwide for increasing popularity towards vegetarian diets. However, a proper description of sensorial attributes of vegetarian pizza is still not available in the existing scientific literature. Such characterization provides inevitable information for product's evaluation and process improvement. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to objectively characterize the sensory attributes of vegetarian pizza using statistical tools. A descriptive score card comprising all the possible sensory attributes of pizza was drafted and finalized by group discussion with sensory evaluation experts. Thirty six pizza samples were collected from different Indian cities. Sensory evaluation was done using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) and significant (p<0.05) difference among the market samples was observed. Principal Component Analysis (PC) revealed five principal components (PC) which accounted for 93% variation in the sensory data viz., (1) cohesiveness of crust/cooking intensity/free moisture of cheese, (2) firmness/crispiness/type of crust, (3) cohesiveness/thickness of cheese, (4) chewiness, and (5) overall acceptability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据