4.8 Review

Review on lignin modifications toward natural UV protection ingredient for lignin-based sunscreens

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 13, 页码 4633-4646

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc01139a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2015M3D3A1A01064882]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignin possesses excellent UV-blocking ability but its intrinsic dark color limits its application in lignin-based sunscreens; to address this issue, researchers have developed various methods including fractionation and modification of lignin's chemical structure, morphology, and particle size.
Lignin is a natural UV-blocking material; it exhibits excellent UV absorption ability owing to its aromatic structure and the presence of numerous phenolic, ketone, and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Recently, the utilization of lignin as a replacement for conventional mineral and synthetic UV protection ingredients in sunscreens has been recognized as an attractive and promising concept from the viewpoint of renewable and sustainable manufacturing of lignin-based products. Despite its significant UV-blocking potential, the intrinsic dark color of lignin results in the unavoidable dark color of lignin-based sunscreens, which significantly limits its wide application. Therefore, the present review focuses on providing a comprehensive insight into lignin-based sunscreens. The positive effects of the sunblocking ability of lignin and the drawbacks associated with lignin-based sunscreens, from the viewpoint of cosmetic appearance, were investigated in detail. To address the bottlenecks of lignin-based sunscreens, several methods, including fractionation and modification on the chemical structure, morphology, and particle size of lignin, were subsequently developed. In addition, future perspectives of lignin-inspired sunscreen production were discussed to suggest promising approaches for a facile and green manufacturing of natural sunscreens from lignin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据