4.6 Article

Confined hydrogenlike ions in plasma environments

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 104, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.012803

关键词

-

资金

  1. BRNS, India [58/14/03/2019-BRNS/10255]
  2. SERB, India [CRG/2019/000293]
  3. CSIR, New Delhi, India [9033A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behavior of H-like ions embedded in astrophysical plasmas is investigated under various plasma conditions, with mathematical models simplified to demonstrate the interactions between them.
The behavior of H-like ions embedded in astrophysical plasmas in the form of dense, strongly and weakly coupled plasmas is investigated. In these, the increase and decrease in temperature are impacted by a change in confinement radius r(c). Two independent and generalized scaling ideas have been applied to modulate the effect of the plasma-screening constant lambda and ion charge Z on such systems. Several relations are derived to interconnect the original Hamiltonian and two scaled Hamiltonians. In the exponential-cosine-screened Coulomb potential (ECSCP; dense) and weakly coupled plasma (WCP) these scaling relations have provided a linear equation connecting the critical screening constant lambda((c)) and Z. Their ratio offers a state-dependent constant beyond which a particular state vanishes. Shannon entropy has been employed to understand the plasma effect on the ion. With an increase in lambda, the accumulation of opposite charge surrounding the ion increases, leading to a reduction in the number of bound states. However, with a rise in ionic charge Z, this effect can be delayed. The competing effect of plasma charge density n(e) and temperature in WCP and ECSCP is investigated. A recently proposed simple virial-like theorem was established for these systems. Multipole (k = 1-4) oscillator strength and polarizabilities for these are studied considering 1s, 2s states. As a bonus, analytical closed-form expressions are derived for f((k)) and alpha((k)) (k = 1-4) involving is and 2s states for the free H-like ion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据