4.8 Article

Adaptive Repetitive Learning Control of PMSM Servo Systems with Bounded Nonparametric Uncertainties: Theory and Experiments

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 8626-8635

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3016257

关键词

Uncertainty; Servomotors; Adaptive systems; Trajectory; Torque; Stators; Adaptive control; nonparametric uncertainties; repetitive learning control (RLC); servo systems

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973274, 61573320]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LQ18E070005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes an adaptive repetitive learning control (ARLC) scheme for PMSM servo systems with bounded nonparametric uncertainties, ensuring high steady-state tracking accuracy without the need for prior knowledge on uncertainty bounds in controller design. This approach divides uncertainties into two parts and utilizes different strategies for each part to achieve effective compensation and superior performance.
In this article, an adaptive repetitive learning control (ARLC) scheme is proposed for permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) servo systems with bounded nonparametric uncertainties, which are divided into two separated parts. The periodically nonparametric part is involved in an unknown desired control input, and a fully saturated repetitive learning law with a continuous switching function is developed to ensure that the estimate of the unknown desired control input is continuous and confined with a prespecified region. The nonperiodically nonparametric part is transformed into the parametric form and compensated by designing the adaptive updating laws, such that a prior knowledge on the bounds of uncertainties is not required in the controller design. With the proposed ARLC scheme, a high steady-state tracking accuracy is guaranteed, and comparative experiments are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据