4.6 Article

Nanoporous gold electrodes modified with self-assembled monolayers for electrochemical control of the surface charge

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 26, 页码 14457-14464

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp01491a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lead Project Porous Materials @ Work at TU Graz [LP-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical behavior of nanoporous gold modified with self-assembled monolayers was investigated, with long-chain MHDA showing the most distinct point of zero charge for precise charge control. Proton transfer reaction studies indicated an increased fraction of electrochemically controllable SAMs compared to planar electrodes, suggesting attractive application potential.
The electrochemical behaviour of nanoporous gold modified with self-assembled monolayers is investigated with regard to its point of zero charge (pzc) and proton transfer reaction. Due to their high surface-to-volume ratio and conductivity, nanoporous electrodes represent promising materials for numerous applications, including the immobilization of biomolecules in biotechnology and biosensing. Therefore, the fundamental understanding and controllability of the surface state of the electrode is essential. To achieve a precise surface charge control, nanoporous gold (npAu) is modified with self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of different lengths (3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid (MHDA)). Cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy are used to determine the pzc. The most distinct pzc, and thus the most precise charge control, is found for the long-chain MHDA. Subsequently, the proton transfer reaction was investigated as a function of pH and scan rate. The observed protonation/deprotonation reaction was qualitatively well in line with the literature for planar gold electrodes, albeit the fraction of electrochemical controllable SAMs increased by a factor of 10 compared to planar electrodes indicating attractive application potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据