4.5 Article

Lineages of Silene nutans developed rapid, strong, asymmetric postzygotic reproductive isolation in allopatry

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1519-1531

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13245

关键词

Asymmetric reproductive isolation; chlorosis; cytonuclear incompatibility; microsatellites; postzygotic reproductive isolation

资金

  1. National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS, Belgium)
  2. French National research Agency [ANR-11-BSV7-013-03, TRANS]
  3. French Research Ministry
  4. College doctoral Lille Nord de France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproductive isolation can rise either as a consequence of genomic divergence in allopatry or as a byproduct of divergent selection in parapatry. To determine whether reproductive isolation in gynodioecious Silene nutans results from allopatric divergence or from ecological adaptation following secondary contact, we investigated the pattern of postzygotic reproductive isolation and hybridization in natural populations using two phylogeographic lineages, western (W1) and eastern (E1). Experimental crosses between the lineages identified strong, asymmetric postzygotic isolation between the W1 and the E1 lineages, independent of geographic overlap. The proportion of ovules fertilized, seeds aborted, and seeds germinated revealed relatively little effect on the fitness of hybrids. In contrast, hybrid mortality was high and asymmetric: while half of the hybrid seedlings with western lineage mothers died, nearly all hybrid seedlings with E1 mothers died. This asymmetric mortality mirrored the proportion of chlorotic seedlings, and is congruent with cytonuclear incompatibility. We found no evidence of hybridization between the lineages in regions of co-occurrence using nuclear and plastid markers. Together, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that strong postzygotic reproductive isolation involving cytonuclear incompatibilities arose in allopatry. We argue that the dynamics of cytonuclear gynodioecy could facilitate the evolution of reproductive isolation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据