4.5 Article

FiSSE: A simple nonparametric test for the effects of a binary character on lineage diversification rates

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1432-1442

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13227

关键词

BiSSE; extinction; key innovation; macroevolution; speciation; species selection

资金

  1. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1256330]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1256330] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely assumed that phenotypic traits can influence rates of speciation and extinction, and several statistical approaches have been used to test for correlations between character states and lineage diversification. Recent work suggests that model-based tests of state-dependent speciation and extinction are sensitive to model inadequacy and phylogenetic pseudoreplication. We describe a simple nonparametric statistical test (FiSSE) to assess the effects of a binary character on lineage diversification rates. The method involves computing a test statistic that compares the distributions of branch lengths for lineages with and without a character state of interest. The value of the test statistic is compared to a null distribution generated by simulating character histories on the observed phylogeny. Our tests show that FiSSE can reliably infer trait-dependent speciation on phylogenies of several hundred tips. The method has low power to detect trait-dependent extinction but can infer state-dependent differences in speciation even when net diversification rates are constant. We assemble a range of macroevolutionary scenarios that are problematic for likelihood-based methods, and we find that FiSSE does not show similarly elevated false positive rates. We suggest that nonparametric statistical approaches, such as FiSSE, provide an important complement to formal process-based models for trait-dependent diversification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据