4.6 Review

Stereogenic and conformational properties of medium-ring benzo-fused N-heterocycle atropisomers

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 33, 页码 7098-7115

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ob00836f

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIRO
  2. ARC [DP180101332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the conformational and stereochemical properties of medium-ring benzo-fused N-heterocycles, highlighting the impact of different structural factors on the atropisomeric nature of these compounds. It serves as a valuable resource for the design, synthesis, and study of new and potentially bioactive compounds.
Medium-ring (7-9-membered) benzo-fused N-heterocycles - a core structure in several important pharmaceuticals - have a diverse range of interesting conformational and stereochemical properties which arise from restricted bond rotation in the non-aromatic ring. The atropisomers of these pharmaceutically relevant N-heterocycles typically exhibit different biological activities, warranting the need to deeply understand the factors controlling the conformation and stereochemistry of the systems. Beginning with a brief introduction to atropisomer classification, this review will detail a number of medium-ring benzo-fused N-heterocycle systems from the recent literature to provide an overview of structural factors which can affect the atropisomeric nature of the systems by altering the overall conformation and rate of stereo-inversion. As well as general factors such as ring-size and sterics, the impact of additional stereocentres in these systems will be addressed. This includes the differences between sulfur, nitrogen and carbon stereocentres, and the consequences of stereocentre placement around the N-heterocycle ring. Further, conformational stabilisation via non-covalent intramolecular bonds will be explored. As such, this review represents a significant resource for aiding in the design, synthesis and study of new and potentially bioactive medium-ring benzo-fused N-heterocycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据