4.8 Article

Carbon nanocoils decorated with a porous NiCo2O4 nanosheet array as a highly efficient electrode for supercapacitors

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 13, 期 27, 页码 11943-11952

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nr00949d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51661145025, 51972039, 51803018]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1902122]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18RC(3)010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilizes functionalized three-dimensional carbon nanocoils on nickel foam as the substrate for fabricating faradaic nickel cobaltite (NiCo2O4) electrode, demonstrating high specific capacitance and excellent cyclic stability.
Well-organized substrate materials are of considerable significance in the development of energy-efficient pseudocapacitor electrodes. Herein, functionalized three-dimensional (3D) carbon nanocoils on nickel foam (CNCs/NF) have been used as the substrate to grow faradaic nickel cobaltite (NiCo2O4) via a solvothermal method. The arrays of NiCo2O4 were assembled by interconnected ultrathin nanosheets with random inter-particle pores. The number of electroactive sites increased specifically because of the porous feature of NiCo2O4 nanosheets and the 3D structure of CNCs/NF. Moreover, the CNCs/NF network aided the electrolyte ions in diffusing deeply within the architecture. The NiCo2O4/CNCs/NF composite exhibited an outstanding specific capacitance of 2821 F g(-1) at the current density of 1 A g(-1), a remarkable rate capability (82.4%) and long cyclic stability (91.7% after 3000 cycles). Such encouraging electrochemical performance was attributed mainly to the synergistic interactions of NiCo2O4 arrays and CNCs/NF substrate that helped achieve efficient redox reactions, enhanced ion diffusivity and excellent electron conductivity. In summary, this binder-free NiCo2O4/CNCs/NF composite electrode paves a way towards the synthesis of highly efficacious electrodes for supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据