4.5 Article

Multivariate phenotypic selection on a complex sexual signal

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 71, 期 7, 页码 1742-1754

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13264

关键词

Acoustic signals; animal communication; gray treefrog; selection analysis; sexual selection; sexual signaling; stabilizing selection

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [00039202, IOS-1452831]
  2. Minnesota Herpetological Society
  3. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Gaige Award
  4. Ford Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1452831] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal signals are complex, comprising multiple components that receivers may use to inform their decisions. Components may carry information of differing value to receivers, and selection on one component could modulate or reverse selection on another, necessitating a multivariate approach to estimating selection gradients. However, surprisingly few empirical studies have estimated the strength of phenotypic selection on complex signals with appropriate design and adequate power to detect nonlinear selection. We used phonotaxis assays to measure sexual selection on the advertisement signal of Cope's gray tree frog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Female preferences were assessed for five signal components using single- and two-stimulus behavioral assays. Linear, quadratic, and correlational selection gradients were estimated from the single-stimulus data. Significant directional selection is acting on call duration, call rate, pulse rate, and relative amplitude; stabilizing selection is acting on call duration and call rate. Under the two-stimulus paradigm, conclusions were qualitatively different, revealing nonlinear selection on all components except call duration. For individual subjects, the outcomes of single- and two-stimulus trials were frequently discordant, suggesting that the choice of testing paradigm may affect conclusions drawn from experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据