3.8 Article

Health Care Professional Students' Perceptions of Teamwork and Roles After an Interprofessional Critical Care Simulation

期刊

DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 174-185

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000472

关键词

Educational strategy; Interdisciplinary critical care simulation; Interprofessional education; Nursing student education; SPICE-R tool; simulation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the Sim-IPE teaching strategy effectively promotes communication and interdisciplinary awareness among students from different disciplines. The more experience students have in the healthcare field, the higher their perception of teamwork and roles/responsibilities.
Background: Educational opportunities for health care professional students to learn collaborative communication and the roles and responsibilities of other disciplines are minimal unless faculty are intentional about facilitating this interdisciplinary learning. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine how a simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) teaching strategy fostered communication and interdisciplinary awareness between students from multiple disciplines. Method: This pretest-posttest design surveyed undergraduate students from 5 disciplines. The Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised tool examined students' perceptions of teamwork and roles after an in-depth, multistate critical care simulation experience. Results: All students' perceptions of teamwork increased after the Sim-IPE. More experience in the health care field is associated with an increased perception of teamwork and roles/responsibilities. Discussion: On the basis of these findings, the critical care Sim-IPE was an effective teaching strategy to increase the perception of roles and responsibilities of interprofessional critical care team members with applicability to many other specialty topics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据