4.5 Article

Population density and structure drive differential investment in pre- and postmating sexual traits in frogs

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1686-1699

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13246

关键词

Anura; multiple amplexus; polyandry; resource allocation; sexual selection; sperm competition; trade-off

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P3 154767]
  2. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [31471996]
  3. Sichuan Province Outstanding Youth Academic Technology Leaders Program [2013JQ0016]
  4. Sichuan Province Department of Education Innovation Team Project [14TD0015, 15TD0019]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_154767] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual selection theory predicts a trade-off between premating (ornaments and armaments) and postmating (testes and ejaculates) sexual traits, assuming that growing and maintaining these traits is costly and that total reproductive investments are limited. The number of males in competition, the reproductive gains from investing in premating sexual traits, and the level of sperm competition are all predicted to influence how males allocate their finite resources to these traits. Yet, empirical examination of these predictions is currently scarce. Here, we studied relative expenditure on pre- and postmating sexual traits among frog species varying in their population density, operational sex ratio, and the number of competing males for each clutch of eggs. We found that the intensifying struggle to monopolize fertilizations as more and more males clasp the same female to fertilize her eggs shifts male reproductive investment toward sperm production and away from male weaponry. This shift, which is mediated by population density and the associated level of male-male competition, likely also explains the trade-off between pre- and postmating sexual traits in our much broader sample of anuran species. Our results highlight the power of such a multilevel approach in resolving the evolution of traits and allocation trade-offs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据