3.9 Article

Non-Invasive Cardiac and Respiratory Activity Assessment From Various Human Body Locations Using Bioimpedance

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2021.3085482

关键词

Bioimpedance; Blood; Sensors; Carotid arteries; Biomedical monitoring; Electrodes; Morphology; Bioimpedance; hemodynamics; impedance cardiography; non-invasive; respiration

资金

  1. U.S. National Institute of Health [1R01EB028106-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzes physiological parameters using bioimpedance sensing technology, showing promising results in estimating heart rate and breathing intervals. The research demonstrates the effectiveness of bioimpedance sensing in monitoring cardiac and respiratory activities, indicating its potential for high-fidelity physiological sensing applications.
Objective: Bioimpedance sensing is a powerful technique that measures the tissue impedance and captures important physiological parameters including blood flow, lung movements, muscle contractions, body fluid shifts, and other cardiovascular parameters. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the modality at different arterial (ulnar, radial, tibial, and carotid arteries) and thoracic (side-rib cage and top thoracolumbar fascia) body regions and offers insights into the effectiveness of capturing various cardiac and respiratory activities. Methods: We assess the bioimpedance performance in estimating inter-beat (IBI) and inter -breath intervals (IBrI) on six-hours of data acquired in a pilot-study from five healthy participants at rest. Results: Overall, we achieve mean errors as low as 0.003 +/- 0.002 and 0.67 +/- 0.28 seconds for IBI and IBrI estimations, respectively. Conclusions: The results show that bioimpedance can be effectively used to monitor cardiac and respiratory activities both at limbs and upper body and demonstrate a strong potential to be adopted by wearables that aim to provide high-fidelity physiological sensing to address precision medicine needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据