4.7 Article

Continuous borehole optical televiewing reveals variable englacial debris concentrations at Khumbu Glacier, Nepal

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-00070-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'EverDrill' Natural Environment Research Council Grant [NE/P002021, NE/P00265X]
  2. AberDoc PhD Scholarship (Aberystwyth University)
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council PhD studentship [NE/L002450/1]
  4. Sagarmatha National Park
  5. NERC [NE/P00265X/1, NE/P002021/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface melting of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers significantly affects the seasonal water supply to millions of people, with the thickness of the supraglacial debris layer playing a key role. Research on the debris-covered Khumbu Glacier in Nepal shows that englacial debris concentrations are higher near the glacier terminus compared to the mid-to-upper ablation area, complicating predictions of future rates of surface melt and debris exhumation.
Surface melting of High Mountain Asian debris-covered glaciers shapes the seasonal water supply to millions of people. This melt is strongly influenced by the spatially variable thickness of the supraglacial debris layer, which is itself partially controlled by englacial debris concentration and melt-out. Here, we present measurements of deep englacial debris concentrations from debris-covered Khumbu Glacier, Nepal, based on four borehole optical televiewer logs, each up to 150m long. The mean borehole englacial debris content is <= 0.7% by volume in the glacier's mid-to-upper ablation area, and increases to 6.4% by volume near the terminus. These concentrations are higher than those reported for other valley glaciers, although those measurements relate to discrete samples while our approach yields a continuous depth profile. The vertical distribution of englacial debris increases with depth, but is also highly variable, which will complicate predictions of future rates of surface melt and debris exhumation at such glaciers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据