4.0 Review

Oral mucositis. Is it present in the immunotherapy of the immune checkpoint pd1/pd-l1 against oral cancer? A systematic review

期刊

MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 E494-E501

出版社

MEDICINA ORAL S L
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.24353

关键词

Oral mucositis; PD1; PD-L1; oral cancer; immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral mucositis is a common complication in oral cancer treatment, and the prevalence of mucositis appears to be lower in new immunotherapy compared to traditional chemotherapy drugs, however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a painful lesion that takes place in the mucosa of the oral cavity, usually its etiology is associated with drug therapies in cancer patients. It is presented as well-defined ulcers whose painful symptomatology sometimes implies the suspension of oncological treatment or parenteral feeding, being therefore an important adverse effect, marking the evolution of these types of therapies against cancer. The present work aim is to know the prevalence of oral mucositis in oral cancer immunotherapy compared to its prevalence in standard therapy. Material and Methods: A protocol was developed for a systematic review following PRISMA (R) guidelines and a focused question (PICO) was constructed. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on electronic databases including PubMed, the SCOPUS database, the Cochrane library and the Web of Science (WOS). Results: Six clinical trials were included that met the different inclusion criteria. In these articles, a discrepancy between the prevalence of OM in patients treated with chemotherapy and patients treated with immunotherapy related to the immune checkpoint PD-1/PD-L1 (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) was observed. Conclusions: The prevalence of oral mucositis is lower in new immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies against oral cancer than drugs used so far (chemotherapy drugs [methotrexate, cisplatin] as well as cetuximab). However, more studies should be carried out to confirm these data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据