4.3 Article

Contextualizing the black church: Analysis of newspaper coverage in the Obama-Wright controversy

期刊

JOURNALISM
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1594-1611

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1464884919856759

关键词

Journalism; journalism (profession); newspapers; race; ethnicity; sources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the contextualized reporting about the black church in newspaper coverage of the 2008 US presidential primary campaign, focusing on the selection of news sources and explanations of the black church. The findings showed that journalists predominantly used Obama and Wright as sources, with less representation from black church sources, indicating a lack of balanced coverage in the controversy.
This study analyzed the contextualized reporting about the black church in newspaper coverage of the 2008 US presidential primary campaign, during which inflammatory sermons by Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Senator Obama's pastor, threatened to undermine Obama's campaign. Given that the news media has been criticized for failing to adequately contextualize the black church in the controversy, we examined articles from major US newspapers for their use of two news routines, selection of news sources and explanations of the black church, to provide an understanding of Wright's sermons. Journalists used Obama and Wright as sources in the stories more than black church sources (80% vs. 62%). Stories also depicted Wright's church relationship with Obama and Wright's achievements (50%-61%). Journalists' and Obama's explanations of the black church (59%-61%) were comparable to depictions of Wright's sermons, their tone, and Wright and Pfleger as campaign problems (56%-67%). In the controversy's latter phase, depictions of Wright and Pfleger as problems occurred more than black church and Obama's explanations, but depictions of Obama's break from Wright occurred more than Wright's defenses. Journalists used several strategies to incorporate black church explanations into their stories; implications for teaching writing routines are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据