4.8 Article

Expanded porphyrins: functional photoacoustic imaging agents that operate in the NIR-II region

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 29, 页码 9916-9921

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1sc01591e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA68682]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation
  3. OncoTEX, Inc.
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801758, 92059108]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2019352, YJKYYQ20190078, GJJSTD20210003]
  6. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0908800]
  7. CAS Key Laboratory of Health Informatics [2011DP173015]
  8. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Optical Imaging [2020B121201010]
  9. Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Shenzhen [JCYJ20190806150001764]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluates two expanded porphyrins as contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging, which have good absorption in the NIR-II region and can respond to stimuli. The use of OctaNPs allows visualization of changes in the acidic environment of the stomach and differentiation between cancerous and healthy tissues.
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) relies on the use of contrast agents with high molar absorptivity in the NIR-I/NIR-II region. Expanded porphyrins, synthetic analogues of natural tetrapyrrolic pigments (e.g. heme and chlorophyll), constitute as potentially attractive platforms due to their NIR-II absorptivity and their ability to respond to stimuli. Here, we evaluate two expanded porphyrins, naphthorosarin (1) and octaphyrin (4), as stimuli responsive PA contrast agents for functional PAI. Both undergo proton-coupled electron transfer to produce species that absorb well in the NIR-II region. Octaphyrin (4) was successfully encapsulated into 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-poly(ethylene glycol) (DSPE-PEG(2000)) nanoparticles to afford OctaNPs. In combination with PAI, OctaNPs allowed changes in the acidic environment of the stomach to be visualized and cancerous versus healthy tissues to be discriminated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据