4.7 Article

Methionine-based carbon monoxide releasing polymer for the prevention of biofilm formation

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 27, 页码 3968-3975

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1py00546d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universitat Regensburg
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-105391GB-C21/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports [BEAGAL18/00166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the site-specific delivery of carbon monoxide using a water-soluble CO-releasing polymer, showing slow, sustained CO release and prevention of biofilm formation against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is being increasingly appreciated as a major physiological gasomediator and plays significant roles in different biological activities. However, site-specific delivery of this toxic gas faces major difficulties in the healthcare system in terms of unavailability of appropriate equipment for delivery. A well-known and most studied carbon monoxide releasing molecule (CORM) is tricarbonyldichlororuthenium(ii) dimer (Ru2Cl4(CO)(6)). However, its use as a therapeutic agent is restricted due to its poor water solubility and a short half-life. In order to solve this issues we have designed and synthesized a water-soluble methionine (methionine methacryloyloxyethyl ester (METMA)) and poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate) containing block-copolymer via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization and attached the CORM in the methionine side chain units. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and FT-IR confirms the presence of CORM molecule into the polymer. The time-dependent CO release from CORM conjugated block-copolymer was investigated by a myoglobin assay. This CORM conjugated block-copolymer slowly and spontaneously released CO with sustained-release kinetics. Moreover, this CO-releasing polymer was able to prevent biofilm formation against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据