4.4 Review

Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A New Era

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 1581-1607

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030149

关键词

artificial intelligence; colorectal cancer; colonoscopy; screening; computer-aided detection; computer-aided diagnosis; robotic-assisted surgery; therapy; precision oncology

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of AI algorithms has had a significant impact on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of colorectal cancer, contributing to a decline in incidence rates. Advanced computer-assisted systems and technologies are revolutionizing CRC care and prevention.
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has permeated the medical field with great success. The widespread use of AI technology in diagnosing and treating several types of cancer, especially colorectal cancer (CRC), is now attracting substantial attention. CRC, which represents the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy in both men and women, is considered a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Our review herein aims to provide in-depth knowledge and analysis of the AI applications in CRC screening, diagnosis, and treatment based on current literature. We also explore the role of recent advances in AI systems regarding medical diagnosis and therapy, with several promising results. CRC is a highly preventable disease, and AI-assisted techniques in routine screening represent a pivotal step in declining incidence rates of this malignancy. So far, computer-aided detection and characterization systems have been developed to increase the detection rate of adenomas. Furthermore, CRC treatment enters a new era with robotic surgery and novel computer-assisted drug delivery techniques. At the same time, healthcare is rapidly moving toward precision or personalized medicine. Machine learning models have the potential to contribute to individual-based cancer care and transform the future of medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据