3.9 Article

Dialysis Initiation and All-Cause Mortality Among Incident Adult Patients With Advanced CKD: A Meta-analysis With Bias Analysis

期刊

KIDNEY MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 64-+

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.09.013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis investigated the impact of dialysis initiation compared with conservative treatment on mortality among adults with advanced CKD. The results indicated that dialysis initiation significantly reduces mortality, and future bias-adjusted meta-analyses should assess outcomes beyond mortality.
Rationale & Objective: Due to unmeasured confounding, observational studies have limitations when assessing whether dialysis initiation reduces mortality compared with conservative therapy among adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We addressed this issue in this meta-analysis. Study Design: Meta-analysis with bias analysis for unmeasured confounding. Setting & Population: Adults with stage 4 or 5 CKD who had initiated dialysis or conservative treatment. Selection & Study Population: Prospective or retrospective cohort studies comparing survival of dialysis versus conservatively managed patients were searched on MEDLINE and Embase from January 2009 to March 20, 2019. Data Extraction: HRs of all-cause mortality associated with dialysis initiation compared with conservative treatment. Analytical Approach: We pooled HRs using a random-effects model. We estimated the percentage of effect sizes more protective than HRs of 0.80 and severity of unmeasured confounding that could reduce this percentage to only 10%. Subgroup analysis was performed for studies with only older patients (aged >= 65 years). Results: 12 studies were included that involved 16,609 dialysis patients and 3,691 conservatively managed patients. A random-effects model suggested that dialysis initiation was associated with a mean mortality HR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.64), in which 92% (95% CI, 50%1 00%) of the true effects were more protective than H Rs of 0.80. To reduce the percentage of HRs < 0.80 to 10%, unmeasured confounder(s) would need to be associated with both dialysis initiation and mortality by relative risks of 4.05 (95% CI, 2.39-4.15), which is equivalent to shifting each study's estimated HR by 2.31-fold (95% CI, 1.51-2.36). Restricting studies to include only older patients did not modify the results. Limitations: Limited number of studies and evidence on the absence of publication bias. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dialysis initiation considerably reduces mortality among adults with advanced CKD. Future bias-adjusted meta-analyses need to assess outcomes beyond mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据