4.7 Article

Aluminium hydroxide waste based geopolymer composed of fly ash for sustainable cement materials

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 298-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.097

关键词

Geopolymer; Sustainable materials; Aluminium hydroxide waste; Fly ash; Compressive strength; NaOH

资金

  1. 100th Anniversary Chulalongkorn University Fund for Doctoral Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report is the first to describe the reuse of aluminium hydroxide waste (Al-waste) for geopolymers. For cement materials, both Al-waste and fly ash (FA) were mixed at different Al-waste contents of 10-60 wt%. The mass ratio of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution was fixed at 2.5. Here, the NaOH concentrations of 5, 10, and 15 M were used as alkaline activators for geopolymerization. Slurry properties for the geopolymers were evaluated using viscoelasticity measurements, which demonstrated that slurry containing higher alumina has a higher elastic modulus and that the setting time is greater than that for pure FA. Then, cured at room temperature for a week and also in an oven at 60 degrees C and 80 degrees C for 24 h, the geopolymerization was increased with increasing concentration of NaOH. After curing, the mechanical properties, microstructure, bonding, and phases of the resultant geopolymers were ascertained. The contents of the Al-waste in the geopolymer influenced the geopolymer strength when NaOH concentration was changed at different curing temperatures. The Al-waste content in the resultant geopolymer at 40 wt% cured at 80 degrees C showed the highest compressive strength of about 40 MPa and also the highest bulk density of about 2.8 g/cm(3). Furthermore, X-ray CT scanning results indicated that the geopolymer with Al-waste content at 40 wt% cured at 80 degrees C exhibited a dense structure, supporting the results obtained for mechanical strength. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据