4.7 Article

Use of phytic acid for selective precipitation of undesirable metals (Al, Fe, Pb) contained in the leachates from hydrometallurgical processes

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105450

关键词

Metal phytates; Agro-resources; Solubility measurement; Precipitation

资金

  1. SusChemProc project
  2. joint French Ministry of Research and Region Lorraine CPER program (2015-2020)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the potential of using phytic acid to remove metal ions from acidic leachates, showing that phytic acid could be an interesting alternative precipitation reagent capable, thermodynamically, of removing Al3+, Fe3+, and Pb2+ effectively.
In hydrometallurgical processes, chemical precipitation is used either to recover dissolved valuable metals or to remove undesirable elements before electrolysis. Beside conventional reagents (Ca(OH)(2), NaOH, Na2CO3...) many authors tried to replace them by bio-sourced compounds, but unfortunately, without necessarily leading to an industrial use. This paper describes a study on the possibility to use phytic acid to remove Al3+, Fe3+ and Pb2+ from acidic leachates. This reagent, present in cereals and considered as an antinutrient, can be recovered from soaking waters of corn. In this work, five metal phytates were synthesized and characterized by TGA and ICP-OES leading to the following formulae: Al3C6H9P6O24,7H(2)O, Cu6C6H6P6O24,8H(2)O, Fe3.5C6H7.5P6O24,15H(2)O, Pb6C6H6P6O24,10H(2)O and Zn6C6H6P6O24,6H(2)O. Solubility of each metal phytate was measured in pure water at 20 degrees C in order to determine their solubility product K-s not available in literature. The conditional solubility as a function of the pH was then established to predict the possibility to perform selective precipitation. The results showed that phytic acid could be an interesting alternative precipitation reagent, able, from a thermodynamical point of view, to remove Al3+, Fe3+ and Pb2+ from copper or zinc leachates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据