4.7 Article

Ozone-based water treatment (O3, O3/UV, O3/H2O2) for removal of organic micropollutants, bacteria inactivation and regrowth prevention

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105315

关键词

Priority substances; Contaminants of emerging concern; Disinfection; Advanced oxidation process; Surface water; Ozone

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement [NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-033330]
  2. Associate Laboratory LSRE-LCM - national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UIDB/50020/2020]
  3. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - LEP-ABE - national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UIDB/00511/2020]
  4. national funds through FCT [UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020]
  5. FCT [SFRH/BD/133117/2017, SFRH/BD/129757/2017, DL57/2016]
  6. European Social Fund
  7. Human Potential Operational Programme
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/133117/2017, SFRH/BD/129757/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ozone-based water treatments proved to be effective in simultaneously removing organic micropollutants and bacteria from surface water samples. Single ozonation was found to be the best treatment solution with removal efficiencies higher than 85% for most OMPs, as well as achieving microbial inactivation to levels below permissible levels for drinking water.
Ozone-based water treatments were investigated to simultaneously remove organic micropollutants (OMPs) and bacteria from surface water samples collected in a river reservoir supplying a drinking water treatment plant. Among the 21 environmentally relevant OMPs selected, 15 were detected at low (< 20) ng L-1 level. Surface water samples were then spiked with these 21 OMPs (100 ng L-1) and the ozone-based treatments were tested with excess of ozone and high hydraulic retention time (HRT: 41 min). Regardless of the treatment applied (O-3, O-3/UVA-LEDs, and O-3/H2O2), removal efficiencies higher than 85% were always obtained for 20 out of 21 OMPs (and lower than 50% for PFOS). Thus, single ozonation was considered the best treatment solution, being afterwards investigated in terms of water disinfection at milder operating conditions (3 mg O-3 L-1 and HRT: 10 min). Under these conditions, the removals of spiked OMPs were also higher than 85% (except for PFOS), whereas bacteria (i.e., total heterotrophs at 37 and 22 degrees C, E. coli and enterococci) decreased to values lower than the permissible levels for drinking water, even upon storage for 3-days. However, lower ozone doses (1.5 mg O-3 L-1) could not prevent the regrowth of total heterotrophs incubated at 37 degrees C, which reached levels five times higher than those recommended. Because drinking water treatments should not only consider OMPs abatement but also microbial inactivation for long periods of time, the results herein obtained point out the importance of using ozone doses capable of accomplish both targets when using single ozonation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据