4.7 Article

Psychobehavioral Responses and Likelihood of Receiving COVID-19 Vaccines during the Pandemic, Hong Kong

期刊

EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1802-1810

出版社

CENTERS DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.3201/eid2707.210054

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Medical Research Fund [INF-CUHK-1, 17160302, 18170312]
  2. General Research Fund [14112818, 24104920]
  3. Wellcome Trust Fund (United Kingdom) [200861/Z/16/Z]
  4. Group Research Scheme of The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  5. Wellcome Trust [200861/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This longitudinal study in Hong Kong found that perceived severity of COVID-19 decreased over time, but perceived susceptibility remained high. Women and individuals with anxiety were more likely to practice social distancing, while intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines declined, influenced by factors such as anxiety level, vaccine confidence, and collective responsibility.
To access temporal changes in psychobehavioral responses to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, we conducted a 5-round (R1-R5) longitudinal population-based online survey in Hong Kong during January-September 2020. Most respondents reported wearing masks (R1 99.0% to R5 99.8%) and performing hand hygiene (R1 95.8% to R5 97.7%). Perceived COVID-19 severity decreased significantly, from 97.4% (R1) to 77.2% (R5), but perceived self-susceptibility remained high (87.2%-92.8%). Female sex and anxiety were associated with greater adoption of social distancing. Intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines decreased significantly (R4 48.7% to R5 37.6%). Greater anxiety, confidence in vaccine, and collective responsibility and weaker complacency were associated with higher tendency to receive COVID-19 vaccines. Although its generalizability should be assumed with caution, this study helps to formulate health communication strategies and foretells the initial low uptake rate of COVID-19 vaccines, suggesting that social distancing should be maintained in the medium term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据